Efficacy of Smartphone Active and Passive Virtual Reality Distraction vs Standard Care on Burn Pain Among Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: It is unknown whether smartphone-based virtual reality (VR) games are effective in reducing pain among pediatric patients in real-world burn clinics. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a smartphone VR game on dressing pain among pediatric patients with burns. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial included children aged 6 to 17 years who seen in the outpatient clinic of a large American Burn Association-verified pediatric burn center and level I pediatric trauma center between December 30, 2016, and January 23, 2019. Speaking English as their primary language was an inclusion criterion. Intention-to-treat data analyses were conducted from December 2019 to March 2020. Interventions: Active VR participants played a VR game; passive VR participants were immersed in the same VR environment without interactions. Both groups were compared with a standard care group. One researcher administered VR and observed pain while another researcher administered a posttrial survey that measured the child's perceived pain and VR experience. Nurses were asked to report the clinical utility. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patients self-reported pain using a visual analog scale (VAS; range, 0-100). A researcher observed patient pain based on the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability-Revised (FLACC-R) scale. Nurses were asked to report VR helpfulness (range, 0-100; higher scores indicate more helpful) and ease of use (range, 0-100; higher scores indicate easier to use). Results: A total of 90 children (45 [50%] girls, mean age, 11.3 years [95% CI, 10.6-12.0 years]; 51 [57%] White children) participated. Most children had second-degree burns (81 [90%]). Participants in the active VR group had significantly lower reported overall pain (VAS score, 24.9 [95% CI, 12.2-37.6]) compared with participants in the standard care control group (VAS score, 47.1 [95% CI, 32.1-62.2]; P = .02). The active VR group also had a lower worst pain score (VAS score, 27.4 [95% CI, 14.7-40.1]) than both the passive VR group (VAS score, 47.9 [95% CI, 31.8-63.9]; P = .04) and the standard care group (VAS score, 48.8 [95% CI, 31.1-64.4]; P = .03). Simulator sickness scores (range, 0-60; lower scores indicate less sickness) were similar for active VR (19.3 [95% CI, 17.5-21.1]) and passive VR groups (19.5 [95% CI, 17.6-21.5]). Nurses also reported that the VR games could be easily implemented in clinics (helpfulness, active VR: 84.2; 95% CI, 74.5-93.8; passive VR: 76.9; 95% CI, 65.2-88.7; ease of use, active VR: 94.8, 95% CI, 91.8-97.8; passive VR: 96.0, 95% CI, 92.9-99.1). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, a smartphone VR game was effective in reducing patient self-reported pain during burn dressing changes, suggesting that VR may be an effective method for managing pediatric burn pain. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04544631.

Virtual Reality-Based Executive Function Rehabilitation System for Children With Traumatic Brain Injury: Design and Usability Study.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) poses a significant threat to children's health. Cognitive rehabilitation for pediatric TBI has the potential to improve the quality of life following the injury. Virtual reality (VR) can provide enriched cognitive training in a life-like but safe environment. However, existing VR applications for pediatric TBIs have primarily focused on physical rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to design and develop an integrative hardware and software VR system to provide rehabilitation of executive functions (EF) for children with TBI, particularly in 3 core EF: inhibitory control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility. METHODS: The VR training system was developed by an interdisciplinary team with expertise in best practices of VR design, developmental psychology, and pediatric TBI rehabilitation. Pilot usability testing of this novel system was conducted among 10 healthy children and 4 children with TBIs. RESULTS: Our VR-based interactive cognitive training system was developed to provide assistive training on core EF following pediatric TBI. Pilot usability testing showed adequate user satisfaction ratings for both the hardware and software components of the VR system. CONCLUSIONS: This project designed and tested a novel VR-based system for executive function rehabilitation that is specifically adapted to children following TBI.

The impact of driving time on pediatric TBI follow-up visit attendance.

Objective: Examine the effect of driving time on follow-up visit attendance for children hospitalized with a traumatic brain injury (TBI). We hypothesized that families who lived further from the hospital would show poorer follow-up attendance.Participants: 368 children admitted to the hospital with TBI.Design & Outcome Measures: Using a retrospective chart review, we calculated driving time from patients' homes. The primary outcome was attendance at the first appointment post-discharge. We used logistic regression to examine the effect of driving time on attendance, including an analysis of the effects of injury and sociodemographic covariates on the model.Results: Majority of children attended their first appointment. Patients living 30-60 min from the hospital were most likely to attend, and those living 15 min away were least likely to attend. After adjusting for patient characteristics, families with driving time of 30-60 min had significantly higher odds of returning for follow-up than those with driving time <15 min, though the significance of this relationship disappeared after specific socioeconomic (SES) factors were included.Conclusions: Distance plays a significant role on follow-up attendance for pediatric patients with TBI. However, neighborhood SES may be an additional factor that influences the significance of the distance effect.Abbreviations: TBI: Traumatic brain injury; SES: socioeconomic status; ISS: Injury severity scale; AIS: Abbreviated injury scale.

Attending Follow-up Appointments After Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: Caregiver-Perceived Barriers and Facilitators.

OBJECTIVE: To examine barriers and facilitators for follow-up care of children with traumatic brain injury (TBI). SETTING: Urban children's hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Caregivers of children (aged 2-18 years) discharged from an inpatient unit with a TBI diagnosis in 2014-2015. DESIGN: Survey of caregivers. MAIN MEASURES: Caregiver-reported barriers and facilitators to follow-up appointment attendance. RESULTS: The sample included 159 caregivers who completed the survey. The top 3 barriers were "no need" (38.5%), "schedule conflicts" (14.1%), and "lack of resources" (10.3%). The top 5 identified facilitators were "good hospital experience" (68.6%), "need" (37.8%), "sufficient resources" (35.8%), "well-coordinated appointments" (31.1%), and "provision of counseling and support" (27.6%). Caregivers with higher income were more likely to report "no need" as a barrier; females were less likely to do so. Nonwhite caregivers and those without private insurance were more likely to report "lack of resources" as a barrier. Females were more likely to report "good hospital experience" and "provision of counseling and support" as a facilitator. Nonwhite caregivers were more likely to report "need" but less likely to report "sufficient resources" as facilitators. CONCLUSIONS: Care coordination, assistance with resources, and improvements in communication and the hospital experience are ways that adherence might be enhanced.